The Stop Signal Task (SST) has been the benchmark for studying the behavioral and physiological basis of movement generation and inhibition. In our study, we extended the scope beyond physiological findings related to muscle activity, focusing our analysis on the initial biomechanical state of the effector. By incorporating a force sensitive resistor (FSR), we continuously monitored the force applied by the effector (here the index finger) during a button release version of the SST. This modified task design allowed us to examine both the baseline force before the relevant Go signal was presented and during the covert state of movement preparation. Notably, variations in force over time in response to the Go signal revealed differences across trials where movement was either generated or successfully inhibited, depending on the amount of force during the baseline period. Specifically, higher baseline force was associated with a delayed movement generation, which simultaneously slowed down the force release, facilitating successful inhibition when requested. Our results highlight the influence of biomechanical variables in movement control, which should be accounted for by the models developed for investigating the physiology of this ability. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Movement involves changing the position of anatomical effectors, like a finger. The initial biomechanical state of an effector impacts movement generation and inhibition. Using the Stop-Signal task, we studied these factors by measuring the force applied to a mouse button before movement onset. Higher initial force delayed movement generation and slowed force release, aiding movement inhibition. This research links behavioral models of action-stopping with movement biomechanics, highlighting the effector’s initial state importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramawat et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: