Objective: To revise the self-rating scale of systemic family dynamics (SSFD) based on its applicability among college students in southwest China. Methods: The study conducted a survey using the Chinese version of the self-rating scale of systemic family dynamics (SSFD) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies depression scale (CES-D) on 3,122 college students from Sichuan, Chongqing, and Guizhou. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on the items of SSFD by SPSS, followed by confirmatory factor analysis by Amos. Results: Based on the factor analysis, the systemic logic dimension of the original scale was removed, retaining three dimensions: family atmosphere, individualization, and disease concepts. The number of items was reduced from 23 to 14. The revised scale’s overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.914, with dimension-specific Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.689 to 0.905. All dimensions and the total score of the revised SSFD showed significant negative correlations with depression (-0.193**, -0.237**, -0.086**, -0.168**). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit indices (GFI = 0.943, IFI = 0.950, CFI = 0.950, NFI = 0.944, RMSEA = 0.069, SMRA = 0.037). Conclusion: The revised SISFD scale features a clear structure and meets measurement standards, making it suitable for measuring systemic family dynamics among southwest China college students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: