Aquavoltaic systems have garnered significant global interest as a solution to the land use conflicts posed by traditional photovoltaic (PV) systems while simultaneously offering benefits within the food–energy nexus. This study proposes a geographic information system (GIS)-assisted framework designed to determine the optimal techno-economic size and potential of aquavoltaic systems in shrimp farming. A GIS is employed to extract spatial information from shrimp ponds, including their locations and areas. Meteorological data pertinent to these locations are utilized as inputs for a PV-generation model. Additionally, optimal aerator operations, based on pond area and farmers' expectations, are determined to create accurate load profiles. Two objectives are established: (1) to identify the optimal aquavoltaic system size considering different system configurations (grid-connected, grid-connected with battery energy storage [BES], and standalone with BES) and (2) to quantify the potential of aquavoltaic systems with varying pond coverage (10%, 20%, and 30%). The proposed framework is validated using real-world data from shrimp farming regions in Thailand. The results indicate that the grid-connected aquavoltaic system is the most preferable configuration, with installed PV capacities varying between 2.78 kWp and 144 kWp, and net present values (NPVs) ranging from –$12,728 to $2,627 per pond. In this configuration, only 2.6% of the pond area is utilized for PV installations. Furthermore, aquavoltaic systems with 30% coverage can significantly boost installed PV capacity by up to 1.32 MWp and the NPV by up to $2.31 billion, contributing to the district's agricultural electricity consumption by approximately 25%. Remarkably, the results reveal that the proposed framework can enhance NPV by up to 4.41% compared to those of existing studies that do not consider spatial data and aerator requirements. This GIS-assisted framework offers a comprehensive and optimized strategy for implementing aquavoltaic systems in shrimp farming, highlighting substantial economic and sustainability benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamroen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: