Objective Multifocal motor neuropathy is a rare chronic immune‐mediated neuropathy with impaired grip strength representing a common symptom. While intravenous immunoglobulin G is an effective treatment for the disease, significant variation in treatment response has been observed but not well understood. This analysis characterized dose–exposure–response relationships in multifocal motor neuropathy, using grip strength as a clinical efficacy measure. Methods Serum immunoglobulin G trough concentrations and grip strength data for the more affected hand from a Phase 3, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover trial of intravenous immunoglobulin 10% in 44 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (NCT00666263) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model. Results The model adequately described the observed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data and relationships between intravenous immunoglobulin 10% dose, serum immunoglobulin G trough levels, grip strength, and inter‐patient variabilities in multifocal motor neuropathy. Model‐based simulations for various dosing regimens (0.4–2.0 g/kg every 2–4 weeks) indicated that ≥1.6 g/kg/month would achieve clinically meaningful improvements in grip strength (≥4 kg) in ≥70% of patients. More frequent dosing at an equivalent monthly dose led to a more consistent response in grip strength. Furthermore, splitting the dose over multiple days for high doses (>1 g/kg) did not impact grip strength. Interpretation These findings suggest that the majority of patients with multifocal motor neuropathy would respond rapidly to intravenous immunoglobulin 10% with a range of dosing regimens. Shorter dosing intervals may avoid the diminishing response seen with longer dosing intervals. Dose‐splitting provided similar outcomes while offering flexibility and convenience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: