⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

July 6, 2024American Journal of Ophthalmology Case ReportsOpen Access

Inverted internal limiting membrane flap combined with subretinal viscoelastic injection for large or chronic macular holes

Xien Lu Tadashi Yokoi Keiko Kataoka Makoto Inoue

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

To report two cases with a large or chronic macular hole (MH) that was closed by combining the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique with the injection of ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD) into the subretinal space through the MH.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Lu et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e612a3b6db6435875a5c8a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2024.102100

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Inverted flap technique versus internal limiting membrane insertion for macular hole in eyes with extremely high myopia2024 · 9 citations
2Combined Epiretinal Proliferation and Internal Limiting Membrane Inverted Flap for the Treatment of Large Macular Holes2024
3Simple Superior Inverted Flap Technique with Extended Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for the Treatment of Large Macular HolesCase Report · 2026
4The inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique is not recommended for the treatment of large macular holes smaller than 650 µm.2024 · 4 citations
5Double flaps of internal limiting membrane for chronic optic pit maculopathy with large outer lamellar hole2024 · 1 citations