Purpose Identify factors contributing to anxiety in individuals without a pre-existing anxiety history post-concussion. Method Patients (n = 264, aged 9–68) presented to a specialty concussion clinic post-concussion. They completed a clinical interview, Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT), Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Concussion Clinical Profile Screening (CP-Screen), and Vestibular/Ocular-Motor Screening (VOMS). Anxiety group was determined by a positive anxiety/mood clinical profile on CP-Screen. Independent samples t-tests and chi-square tests examined differences in demographics, medical history, and injury characteristics between groups. Univariate logistic regressions (LR) informed a follow-up forward stepwise LR to identify best predictors of post-concussion anxiety group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify which predictors retained from the LR model best-discriminated anxiety status. Statistical significance was set a priori at p < 0.05. Results Results of forward stepwise LR identifying factors contributing to post-concussion anxiety were significant (p < 0.001) and accounted for 19% of the variance. The model accurately classified 82.2% of patients, with non-Sport Related Concussion (SRC) (OR = 2.94, 95%CI, 1.45–1.5.98, p = 0.003), history of ADHD/LD (OR = 2.85, 95%CI, 1.21–6.71, p = 0.02), positive vestibular profile (OR = 2.14, 95%CI, 1.06–4.33, p = 0.03), and days to first clinic visit (OR = 1.01, 95%CI, 1.01–1.015, p = 0.003) as significant predictors. ROC analysis of the AUC of this 4-factor model discriminated post-concussion anxiety from no anxiety (AUC, 0.77, 95%CI, 0.71–0.85, p < 0.001). Conclusions Findings suggest that non-SRC, ADHD/LD history, positive vestibular profile, and delayed clinic visit, may contribute to post-concussion anxiety among patients without prior anxiety history. These predictors may guide clinicians in tailoring interventions to optimize recovery outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: