This study assesses the efficacy of a variety of neural network models in predicting gold prices, with a particular emphasis on GRU, N-BEATS, N-BEATS-GRU, N-BEATS-LSTM, and LSTM. We evaluated the models using a comprehensive dataset and metrics such as MSE, MAE, MAPE, and RMSE. The GRU model demonstrated the highest MAPE of 3.10%, as indicated by the results. N-BEATS was the second-best-performing model. In stark contrast to expectations, hybrid models, notably N-BEATS-LSTM, underperformed. Compared to LSTM-based models, visual analysis demonstrated that GRU and N-BEATS more effectively captured short-term and long-term trends. The results indicate that simplified models, such as GRU, may be more effective than complex hybrids in predicting gold prices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
- et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: