Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of Brunnstrom movement therapy and mirror therapy (MT) on hand function in the post-stroke hemiplegic population. Methods: This randomized control pilot trial was conducted at District Headquarters Hospital and Rafiqa Hospital Sargodah, Pakistan in 2022. A total of 26 stroke patients having spastic hands aged 40–70 were randomized into two groups. Group A was treated with Brunnstrom movement therapy along with conventional treatment. Group B was treated with MT and conventional treatment. Fugl-Meyer assessment: wrist and hand subtest (items VII, VIII, and IX) and Brunnstrom hand manipulation were used to assess outcome measures. Results: Twenty-six patients of both sexes, 13 in each group. The mean age in Group A was 58.30 ± 7.53, and Group B’s was 57.46 ± 8.40. Brunnstrom movement and MT scores showed a statistically significant difference within a group ( P < 0.05). The between-group comparison showed a statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05). Between-group comparison of results showed marked improvement in Fugl-Meyer in the case of Brunnstrom movement therapy compared to MT. Conclusion: This study concluded that stroke patients treated with Brunnstrom movement therapy showed more improvement in hand functioning and activities of daily living than those treated with MT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nimra et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: