Purpose The purpose of this study is to characterize and discuss the difference between software-detected non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) and the traditional clinical method of fluorescein break-up time (FBUT). Methods Tear interferometry with the KOWA DR-1α (Kowa, Japan) and a standardized comprehensive ocular surface/tear evaluation were performed in 307 eyes. Software-detected NIBUT in the KOWA DR-1α images and the investigator-detected FBUT were compared. Results Software-detected NIBUT was significantly shorter than investigator-measured FBUT. NIBUT was 3.1 ± 2.5 s (mean ± SD), whereas FBUT was 4.8 ± 3.0 s. This difference was due to three different patterns or conditions: a spot break immediately after eyelid opening, moderate to severe keratitis sicca, and epithelial basement membrane corneal dystrophy (EBMD). In these cases, rapid tear film disruption was not captured by FBUT. A spot break immediately after eye opening that rapidly disappears was observed with conjunctivochalasis. This type of break-up may be difficult to detect using fluorescein because the human eye cannot catch such rapid blinks or post-blink events. In the second group with severe corneal epithelial disease, break-up may occur over the entire corneal surface upon eye opening, and distinct fluorescein tear break-up may not be identified because of poor dye dilution or spread over the corneal surface, whereas the non-invasive break-up is not solution-dependent, and the software can detect a distinct appearance. In the third group with EBMD, it is possible that focal break-up in the fluorescein pattern over the epithelial elevations, which might be missed visually, can be detected by software in video images. Conclusion We found that software-detected NIBUT is more sensitive in detecting tear break-up, can identify certain tear film disruptions that are missed by traditional FBUT, and may be more useful in distinguishing certain tear disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pflugfelder et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: