Given its role as a primary side product and a potential soft oxidant in the oxidative coupling of methane (OCM), understanding the effect of CO 2 co‐feeding on OCM emerges as a key milestone to optimize the process. To grasp the molecular impact of CO 2 , a mechanistic investigation over a La‐Sr/CaO catalyst was carried out via microkinetic modeling. Seven catalyst descriptors with a precise physico‐chemical meaning were regressed for both pure O 2 and CO 2 co‐feeding in order to assess eventual structural changes induced in the catalyst by the presence of CO 2 in the feed. Global significance was achieved in both regressions and experimental trends were successfully reproduced by the specifically determined catalyst descriptors. CO 2 co‐feeding is deemed responsible for generating a new active phase, for example, by converting metal oxides into (oxy‐)carbonates, among others, resulting in a decrease in active site density (D 16 ) from 10 × 10 −5 mol/m 2 to 7 × 10 −5 mol/m 2 . In the presence of the CO 2 ‐induced phase, the catalyst exhibits higher attraction for unsaturated hydrocarbons as indicated by the higher initial sticking probabilities of CH 3 • (D 11 ) and C 2 H 4 (D 15 ), which increase from 4.9 × 10 −4 to 8 × 10 −2 and from 2.1 × 10 −2 to 3 × 10 −2 , respectively. Additionally, there are also lower the overall energy barriers for the activation of hydrocarbons on the catalyst, stemming from the decrease in the H abstraction enthalpy from CH 4 (D 1 ) from 14 to 6 kJ/mol. The operating conditions, in particular the O 2 content, are critical in distinguishing the effect of CO 2 co‐feeding. While at typical operating conditions, CO 2 promotes the total oxidation of methane, in the prerequisite of reduced amount of O 2 , it may also act as an additional oxygen donor. This work provides molecular details on the CO 2 induced changes in catalyst properties but also provides unprecedent quantified insights of the reaction mechanism underlying experimental observations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: