In this article, I argue for a local and regional focus on landscape racializations rather than a national lens for engaging with the Plantationocene. Racial formations on and around Indonesia's plantations have emerged differently across regions and through varied colonial-era and contemporary land and labor politics. Inspired by diverse scholars' historical and contemporary treatments of embodied and emplaced racialisms, I use a region in West Kalimantan Province (Indonesian Borneo) to argue that it is misleading to claim a national-level Plantationocene history relevant to all subnational regions. I then unpack racialized and gendered fictions deployed by state actors to justify the protracted political violence (1967–74) that led to the national state's expropriation of land held by smallholders of Chinese and Chinese-Dayak descent in half the province. All seized land was reclassified as state land to mask its origins and redistributed to non-Chinese local people and transmigrants who worked the regional rubber plantation. This violent reracializing of the West Kalimantan landscape is the antithesis of the racialisms associated with plantation production in Java and Sumatra. Knowing this region-specific history can help in supporting contemporary struggles against entrenched patterns of racialized injustice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nancy Lee Peluso (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: