This research aims to analize the appointment of an ex-convict of corruption to be a Commissioner of BUMN and the subsidiary company of BUMN from a legal perspective and its implication for Good Corporate Governance Practices. The result showed that the appointment of an ex-convict of corruption to be a Commissioner of BUMN and the subsidiary company of BUMN is considered as a violation of law because it doesn’t fulfill the Integrity aspect. The violation of integrity showed that Good Corporate Governance is not fully materialized in a corporate practice, especially BUMN and the subsidiary company of BUMN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kinanti Rizkika (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: