Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Coupled cluster theory has had a momentous impact on the ab initio prediction of molecular properties, and remains a staple ingratiate in high-accuracy thermochemical model chemistries. However, these methods require inclusion of at least some connected quadruple excitations, which generally scale at best as O(N⁹) with the number of basis functions. It very difficult to predict, a priori, the effect correlation past CCSD(T) has on a give reaction energies. The purpose of this work is to examine cost-effective quadruple corrections based on the factorization theorem of many-body perturbation theory that may address these challenges. We show that the O(N⁷), factorized CCSD(TQf) method introduces minimal error to predicted correlation and reaction energies as compared to the O(N⁹) CCSD(TQ). Further, we examine the performance of Goodson's continued fraction method in the estimation of CCSDT(Q)_Λ contributions to reaction energies, as well as a "new" method related to %TAE[(T)] that we refer to as a scaled perturbation estimator. We find that the scaled perturbation estimator based upon CCSD(TQf)/cc-pVDZ is capable of predicting CCSDT(Q)_Λ/cc-pVDZ contributions to reaction energies with an average error of 0.07 kcal mol⁻¹ and a RMST of 0.52 kcal mol⁻¹ when applied to a test-suite of nearly 3000 reactions. This offers a means by which to reliably ballpark how important post-CCSD(T) contributions are to reaction energies while incurring no more than CCSD(T) formal cost and a little mental math.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thorpe et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: