UDC 517.5 We discuss the problem of uniqueness of a meromorphic function f ( z ) , which shares a 1 ( z ) , a 2 ( z ) , and a 3 ( z ) CM with its shift f ( z + c ) , where a 1 ( z ) , a 2 ( z ) , and a 3 ( z ) are three c -periodic distinct small functions of f ( z ) and c ∈ ℂ ∖ { 0 } . The obtained result improves the recent result of Heittokangas et al. [Complex Var. and Elliptic Equat., 56, No. 1–4, 81–92 (2011)] by dropping the assumption about the order of f ( z ) . In addition, we introduce a way of characterizing elliptic functions in terms of meromorphic functions sharing values with two of their shifts. Moreover, we show by a number of illustrating examples that our results are, in certain senses, best possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majumder et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: