Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 2, 2024

Statistical (non)Significance ≠ (un)Successful Replication: The Importance of the Smallest Effect Size of Interest

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PRPaul RiesthuisMaastricht UniversityCMCristian MesquidaEindhoven University of TechnologyRCRobert A. CribbieUniversity of Southern California

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Riesthuis et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e61a6ab6db6435875ad2edhttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s3zfy
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Replication Dilemma: Potential Challenges in Measuring Replication Value—A Commentary on Isager, Van’t Veer, & Lakens (2024)2024
  2. 2Replication of “null results” – Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Replication of null results: Absence of evidence or evidence of absence?2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4Challenging the N-Heuristic: Effect size, not sample size, predicts the replicability of psychological science2024 · 7 citations
  5. 5Replication Value: A Comment and Alternative2024