This paper considers the practical and ethical issues related to the death of a sperm donor. It looks at whether sperm banks should check whether the donor is alive at the time the spermatozoa is made available. Knowing that the donor has died in combination with the cause of death can provide important medical information but the chance is very small. However, when the information is available, it may help to decide whether to tell previous recipients and/or to block the remaining samples for future use. A second advantage may be that the donor's offspring can be informed that contact will not be possible and that recipients who are planning to order spermatozoa from an identity‐release donor can be told that the donor has died. However, these advantages presume that identifiable equals contactable while there is no strict link between these two conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guido Pennings (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: