BACKGROUND: Uncertainty persists regarding the impact of very long-term liquid nitrogen storage (>10 years) on sperm quality, particularly for oncology patients and those with suboptimal initial semen quality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of storage duration on post-thaw motility parameters and clinical assisted reproductive technologies (ART) utility using a robust paired-sample design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This paired cohort study analyzed 101 semen samples (62 cancer, 39 non-cancer) at two time points: immediately after freezing (T0) and after 2-12 years of storage (T1) in 0.3-mL high-security straws. Total/progressive motility and motile sperm counts (TMSC/PMSC) were compared using random-effects modeling with interaction terms for patient subgroups. RESULTS: Sperm parameters showed minimal average change over the 2-12-year storage range, with no evidence of differential T0-T1 variation according to initial sperm quality or diagnosis (all interaction p values >0.3). An exploratory analysis of the small 11-12-year subgroup (n = 24; including 21 oncology patients) showed a significant but modest decline in total motility (-3.6%; p < 0.05) and motile counts (TMSC -0.5 M; p < 0.05). Concordance coefficients provided supporting information on relative agreement between T0 and T1 (Lin's > 0.70; p < 0.001), and most samples (84.6% overall, 87.5% in the 11-12-year group) maintained their original ART eligibility (intrauterine insemination [IUI]/in vitro fertilization [IVF]/intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI]). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Human sperm motility showed limited average changes over the 2-12-year storage range. The exploratory findings in the small 11-12-year subgroup, predominantly composed of oncology patients, suggest modest changes with limited impact on ART strategy. These results provide reassuring evidence for long-term counseling in oncofertility and support the clinical management of cryopreserved sperm samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lucas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: