We give an explicit version for van der Corput's d-th derivative estimate of exponential sums. Theorem. Let X, and Y be such that Y>d where d≥3 is a natural number. Let f(X,X+Y] be a real function with continuous derivatives up to the order d. Assume that 0<λ≤ f⁽ᵈ⁾(x)≤Λ for X<x≤ X+Y. Denote by D=2ᵈ. Then {equation}|1/Y∑X<n≤ X+Ye(f(n))|≤max\{A_d(Λ/λ Y)2/D, B_d(Λ^2/λ)1/(D-2),C_d(λ Y^d)-2/D\},{equation} where Ad, Bd, and Cd are explicit constants. They depend on d but for d≥2 for example Ad< 7.5, Bd<5.8 and Cd<10.9. We follow the reasoning of van der Corput in three papers published in 1937, that contained an error. I correct this error and try to get the smallest possible constants. We apply this theorem to zeta sums, giving the best choice of d in each case. Also, we prove that our Theorem implies Titchmarsh's Theorem 5.13.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Juan Arias de Reyna (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: