Treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) may pose some difficulties in clinical practice, with a relevant proportion of patients being refractory to at least two courses of biological treatment, 1 thus leading to persistent inflammation/pain and diminished quality of life (sometimes regardless of objective signs of inflammation). 1 Hence, there is a need to find alternative treatments in such a subset of biologics-refractory PsA patients.In this analysis, we investigated the efficacy of bimekizumab (BKZ), an inhibitor of IL17A and IL17F, in biologicsrefractory PsA (defined as the failure of at least two courses of biological treatment) in a real-life setting.Specifically, we considered psoriatic subjects from our combined dermatology-rheumatology clinic who also had active PsA and were candidates for BKZ therapy for skin disease.A comprehensive rheumatological examination including swollen joint count (SJC) in 66 joints, tender joint count (TJC) in 68 joints and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), collection of PsA related Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) and a sonographic assessment in 48 joints, 36 tendons and 12 enthesis were performed at baseline (w0), as well as week 12 (w12) and 24 (w24).The active sonographic site count score (ie, US active site count) was defined by a radiologist, blinded to the clinical evaluation as the sum of active synovitis, 2 active tenosynovitis 3 and active enthesitis 4 in each patient.All data are expressed as mean values or percentages; statistical analysis was performed by using Mann-Whitney U-test with a p-value of 0.05 deemed as statistically significant.In total, seven psoriatic patients (mean age 54.5 ± 15 years; 4/7 male; Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI): mean 8.5 ± 5.1) with active and biologics-refractory PsA (mean Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA): 35.9 ± 20) were included in this analysis (Table 1).Among them, 5/7 (71.4%) were classified as difficult to treat (D2T) PsA patients (defined as failure of at least two mechanisms of action + persistent moderate disease activity). 5At w12, 5/7 patients (71.4%) experienced a significant joint improvement with achievement of DAPSA-low disease activity, whereas PASI100 was achieved in 5/7 patients (71.4%).Six out of seven patients (85.7%) reached the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for both DAPSA and PASI. 6,7Interestingly, we observed an improvement even in three out of four patients who had previously failed other IL-17A inhibitors.In terms of mean values, we observed DAPSA and PASI amelioration, with figures of 13.8 ± 6.9 (Δ DAPSA 22.1) and 3.2 ± 7.4 (Δ PASI 5.3), respectively; at week 24, DAPSA-low disease activity and PASI100 rates were maintained (Figure 1).Notably, six out seven patients (85.7%) did not display significant joint inflammatory objective findings during baseline clinical and sonographic examinations (SJC mean 0.67 ± 0.81; US active site count mean 0.83 ± 0.75; CRP mean 0.21 ± 0.1 mg/dl) despite experiencing active disease according to TJC (mean 11.3 ± 15.8) and patient-reported outcomes (mean PtGA 6.33 ± 2.7; mean VAS pain 6.2 ± 2.5).Considering such a subset of patients, BKZ showed a 40% decrease in TJC (Δ 4.5; p=0.26) and a significant reduction of Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores (p=0.025 and p=0.025,
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zabotti et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: