Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Panel data analysis reveals how digitalization affects corruption across governance contexts, indicating context-specific implications.
Digital technologies are often perceived to be uniformly positive tools for anti-corruption purposes creating more transparency and making governments more accountable. However, the evidence is inconsistent and scarce with empirical research narrowly focused on ICT as a specific aspect of digitalization. This study offers new insights based on a context-dependent perspective to solve the puzzle with a more holistic view of the digital transformation process. We distinguish between rule-based and non-rule-based countries as different governance environments and suggest that the context determines how digitalization plays out. While digital tools contribute to the fight against bribery in rule-based economies, they facilitate corruptive practices in non-rule-based countries. A panel data analysis on 72 countries over a 9-year period from 2012 to 2020 supports our arguments and confirms the context-specific nature of digital transformation and its discrepant implications for different societies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bajestani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: