Objective: The increasing incidence of chronic skin infections caused by Mycobacterium marinum , coupled with the time-consuming and low detection rates nature of traditional culture and histological-based diagnostic methods, underscores the need for an expedited approach. The study aims to develop a rapid and efficient method for detecting M. marinum with PCR technology. Methods: We designed four pairs of primers based on DNA sequences from GeneBank and prior studies, we utilized both PCR and Real-time PCR to identify M. marinum . Specificity and sensitivity assessments were conducted in vitro by DNAs extracted from M. marinum and other bacterial or fungal cultures. Further validation was performed through the implementation of a mouse skin infection model to optimize and confirm the efficacy of the detection method in both fresh and paraffin-embedded skin tissues. The same PCR testing system was further confirmed with paraffin-embedded skin tissues samples from patients as well. Results: The results of the study indicate promising outcomes for the four-pair primers system. It demonstrated 100% sensitivity in detecting M. marinum from purified cultures, including typical strains and nine clinical isolates, while achieving a specificity of 100%. This specificity was evidenced by the absence of PCR products from 12 bacterial species, 12 fungi species, and six other non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) species. In the animal model, the PCR assay exhibited high detection efficacy for both infected fresh tissues and paraffin-embedded tissues, with a slight superiority observed in fresh tissues. However, the PCR assay exhibited high detection efficacy for clinical paraffin-embedded tissues. These findings collectively underscore the robust detection capabilities of our four-pair primers in both in vitro and in vivo settings. Conclusion: A sensitive and highly specific rapid detection system has been successfully developed that can be used to detect M. marinum in both infected fresh tissues and paraffin-embedded tissues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: