Idealized models are analyzed to quantify how large‐scale river plumes interact with coastal corners with and without wind‐driven currents. The configuration has a corner formed by two perpendicular shelves (with constant slope) that are joined with a coastal radius of curvature ( r c ). The buoyant plume originates from an upstream point source. The r c and wind forcing are varied among runs. Steep‐ and gentle‐slope runs are compared for some situations. Without winds, plumes separate from corners with r c smaller than two inertial radii ( r i ); this threshold is twice the r c < r i theoretical separation criterion. After separation, no‐wind plumes form an anticyclonic bulge, and reattach farther downstream. Offshore excursion increases as r c decreases. A downwelling‐favorable wind component along the upstream coast ( τ sx ) favors separation by increasing total plume speed. An upwelling‐favorable wind component along the downstream coast ( τ sy ) also increases offshore excursion. Winds blowing obliquely offshore with both these wind components advect the plume farther offshore. Wind‐driven currents that steer plumes in this situation include a downshelf jet originating on the upstream shelf and continuing around the coastal corner and beyond, offshore and upshelf surface transport downstream of the corner, and surface Ekman transport on the outer shelf. Multiple linear regressions quantify plume position sensitivity to r c , τ sx , and τ sy ; results are discussed in a dynamical context. Globally, many river plumes interact with coastal corners under various wind conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael M. Whitney (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: