The efficiency of soil phosphorus (P) mobilization and uptake by plants depends on a complex combination of factors, including plant P acquisition strategies and soil P availability. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the capabilities of three legume species (blue lupin ( Lupinus angustifolius L.), faba bean ( Vicia faba L.), and chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.)), which may be used as green manures in temperate crop systems to acquire P from a soil with different levels of plant‐available P. Three cycles of each legume were grown in a glasshouse over a 6 month period in the same soil type with high (Olsen P: 47 mg kg −1 ) and low (Olsen P: 9 mg kg −1 ) levels of plant‐available P. Measurements included above—and below—ground plant biomass and P uptake, in addition to determination of acid and alkaline phosphomonoesterase activities, microbial P, and P fractions in soil at the end of the experiment. In both soils, plant biomass, P uptake, and microbial P were all higher under faba bean compared to blue lupin and chickpea ( p < .05). In the low‐P soil, faba bean increased alkaline phosphomonoesterase activity ( p < .05). Significant depletion of inorganic P in the soluble (46%–69%), labile (29%–42%), and moderately labile (15%–16%) pools and increase of organic P in the labile (13%–18%) and total (7%–13%) pools occurred under faba bean compared with blue lupin, while changes under chickpea were between those determined for faba bean and blue lupin ( p < .05). The findings of this study indicated that inclusion of faba bean green manure may have the potential to improve overall P use efficiency by enhancing mobilization of labile soil inorganic P, although further research is required to investigate mobilization of more stable forms of soil legacy P and quantify the potential of faba bean as a green manure crop under field conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gotz et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: