Aim In phase 3 studies, dupilumab significantly improved disease severity in children with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This study investigates the impact of dupilumab on children in real-world treatment settings in comparison to other systemic treatments. Material and Method PEDISTAD (NCT03687359) is an ongoing study in patients aged < 12 years with moderate-to-severe AD. Effects of dupilumab, methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine (CsA) on Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) total score and% affected body surface area (BSA) were assessed from first treatment episode (FTE) to last observation (LO). Results 129 patients received dupilumab (median treatment observation period: 17.0 months; 3-year discontinuation rate: 10.1%), 70 CsA (12.2 months; 40.0%), and 77 MTX (21.3 months; 22.1%). The proportion of patients with clear/mild AD (EASI < 7 [range 0–72]) increased for dupilumab (FTE: 27.0%; LO: 78.8%), CsA (18.8%; 54.6%), and MTX (13.3%; 58.7%). Mean (± SE) EASI scores significantly improved with dupilumab (FTE: 18.4 ± 1.3; LO: 5.0 ± 0.7; P < 0.0001), CsA (16.9 ± 1.4; 10.0 ± 1.4; P < 0.0001), and MTX (16.6 ±1.3; 8.4 ± 1.1; P < 0.0001). Mean (± SE) BSA affected also significantly decreased for dupilumab (37.5 ± 2.2; 15.6 ± 2.3; P < 0.0001), CsA (36.9 ± 2.8; 24.0 ± 2.8; P = 0.0001), and MTX (34.3 ± 2.3; 20.3 ±2.5; P < 0.0001). The exposure-adjusted AE/serious AE rate per 100 patient-years was 29.2/1.5 for dupilumab; 43.5/0.9 for CsA; and 30.7/0.6 for MTX, and the rate of patients with any AE requiring corrective treatment or therapy was 1.0, 4.4 and 4.2 per 100 patient-years respectively. Conclusions Dupilumab treatment led to numerically greater improvement in disease severity and was also associated with lower treatment discontinuation and fewer AEs compared with MTX and CsA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baselga et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: