Objectives: the objective of the current study was to assess the microleakage and fracture resistance of pulpotomized primary molars that were rebuilt with fiber-reinforced composite and either had or did not have a stainless-steel crown. subjects and methods: 96 carious primary molar teeth were categorized into four groups; the first group; primary molar teeth restored with fiber reinforced composite, the second group; primary molar teeth restored with fiber reinforced composite and stainless-steel crown, the third group; primary molar teeth restored with composite, the fourth group; primary molar teeth restored with composite and stainless-steel crown. Microleakage and fracture resistance were assessed. Results: lower microleakage values were recorded in teeth restored with stainless-steel crowns, and the higher microleakage values were recorded in teeth restored without stainless-steel crowns. the higher fracture resistance values were recorded in teeth restored with stainless-steel crowns, and the lower fracture resistance values were recorded in teeth restored without stainless-steel crowns. However, the teeth restored with fiber reinforced composite showed higher significant fracture resistance values when compared with the teeth restored with composite. Conclusion: SSC has received a high recommendation for primary molars that have undergone pulp treatment. FRC is advised in situations where parents have cosmetic concerns, provided that dental health is preserved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abu-Taleb et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: