This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Mangifera indica L. Known as the mango, is a type of flowering plant in the Anacardiaceae family that has been grown for thousands of years in India. Mango fruit is a source of fiber, essential amino acids and number of vitamins and other phytochemicals. Traditional medicine systems have widely used different parts of mango plant as a preventive measure to treat several diseases. The various bioactive phytochemicals present in the M. indica contributes to its anti-inflammatory and health promoting properties. Aim and Objectives: Our present research work aims at the comparative phytochemical analyses along with in-vitro and in-silico pharmacological screening of three different cultivars of mango leaves (Himsagar, Langra, Amrapali) via molecular docking interactions as well as physicochemical characterizations of prepared metal nanoconjugates. Results: The results highlighted that ethanolic extract of Amrapali showed maximum total polyphenol (138.75±3.38 mg GAE/ gm. of DW) and flavonoid (52.23±7.41 mg QE/ gm. of DW) content, while ethanolic Himsagar extract showed maximum total flavonol (13.91±0.38 mg QE/ gm. of DW) and tannin (7.16±0.05 mg TAE/ gm. of DW) content. On the contrary, ethanolic extract of Amrapali showed highest% of in-vitro free radical scavenging potential. In-silico evaluation of medicinal potential of the extracts showed that eremophyllene and β-bisabolene showed the showed highest binding affinity (-7.3 kcal/mol.) against Humna androgen receptor (PDB ID: 1E3G), comparable to standard anticancer drug tamoxifen (-7.4 kcal/mol.). The result of the antibacterial study of these nano-conjugates showed antibacterial activity against both Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusion: The overall research study showed that mango leaves contain several naturally occurring potential bioactive compounds that can act as a source of therapeutic possibility which is proven via both in-vitro and in-silico mode of characterizations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatterjee et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: