Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Author critically discusses the theoretical assumptions underlying Nicolai Hartmann's 1933 The Problem of Spiritual Being. The Author deals with the main categorial problems involved in the Hartmannian discussion about the spiritual being, also looking at his previous production. In particular, the Author analyzes the position of the ontic level of spiritual being with respect to the previous three real ontic levels (inorganic, organic, psychological) and the mutual relationship between the three fundamental forms of spiritual being identified by Hartmann (personal, objective, objectified). The Author believes that the 1933 volume has been poorly considered in its direct links with the overall project of critical ontology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matteo Gargani (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: