Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The jurisdictional decisión when resolving specific cases often exceed the content of the spirit of the law itself. of the law itself. Or, the scope that the legislator intended to give to the law may be limited. to give to it. The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, by means of its interprets what should prevail, and such interpretation is mandatory for local courts. such interpretation is mandatory for local courts. This is the case with the judgment in Amparo en Revisión 2666/2020, which resolves the unconstitutionality of the unconstitutionality related to the payment of the reparation of damages resulting from a crime and that crime and which is a right of the victims in criminal proceedings. Now then, justifies its analysis, derived from the fact that this interpretation will be applied in matters resolved on criminal matters resolved in criminal matters in local Courts, since the National Code of Criminalthe National Code of Criminal Procedures is applicable in all the courts of the country.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flores-Corvera et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: