On 4 August ws, item 497) – the Central Register of Voters was launched. This register replaced more than 2,500 previously functioning registers. The change in this respect – in the legislator’s opinion – was dictated primarily by the necessity to eliminate possible irregularities related to discrepancies of data in individual registers and the possibility of duplication of voter data, whichwould result in errors in the election process. However, another equally important argument cannot be overlooked, namely to make the electoral process and the elections themselves more accessible to voters. The above assumptions need to be examined and the question of whether they have actually been achieved needs to be answered. I provide such an answer in the following article. The study uses dogmatic-legal and theoretical-legal methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beata Stępień-Załucka (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: