We present an exploratory, in-the-wild study in which a small hobby drone and a game controller were freely used by fve people in their domestic environments, indoors and outdoors.All participants had motor disabilities afecting their arms and hands, and two also used wheelchairs.One participant contributed as a community researcher, assisting in data analysis, refecting on fndings, drawing conclusions, and co-authoring this paper.The fndings reveal several usability and accessibility issues, along with potential risks and opportunities for the use of hobby drones in everyday situations.Beyond these insights, we discuss the importance of including people with lived experience of disability in research to shape a holistic and inclusive understanding of the use of mainstream artifacts such as hobby drones.This also helps prevent able-bodied design norms from limiting who can use drone technology and how it is used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindgren et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: