In contrast to the mutli-class classification where one and only one class would be assigned to each instance, multi-label classification allows for more flexible classification and possibility of having multiple labels for instance. This property enables us to model the dependencies between the classes such as effect of one label on the probability of occurrence of the other label. Considering these connections between the classes can help us to enhance the reliability of classifier and handle the contradictory prediction. Much like how we can assign multiple classes to an instance, we can also have an instance that remains unlabeled. This class is typically referred to as the "neutral" label, allowing us to bluntly state that we lack sufficient information to label the instance with adequate certainty. Leveraging these properties, a 1D convolutional neural network (CNN) has been proposed to classify common faults occurring in the bearings. Network has the capability to assign a Confidence level between 0 to 1 to each class independently. Later, a threshold has been set on each class to identify the instance labels if any. Subsequently, instances with contradictory predicted label have been flagged as undetermined and removed from the predicted result. thus, the remaining classified instances can be labeled with sufficient confident. In the end, the multi-label CNN model performance has been compared with equivalent multi-class CNN model. Technique has been evaluated using MAFAULDA open dataset which is composed of 1951 multivariate time-series acquired by a triaxial accelerometer, a microphone, and a tachometer using SpectraQuest’s Machinery Fault Simulator (MFS) experimentally simulating different bearing states including normal operation as well as inner and outer race bearing faults. A data reduction scheme has been performed on the dataset to make the diagnostic more challenging and evaluate the performance of CNN in more realistic condition with insufficient data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mostafavi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: