Objectives: There has been limited data regarding the relationship between Vitamin D and depression. The objective of this study was to study the association between serum vitamin D levels and depressive symptoms, as well as vitamin D intake and clinical depression in US adults. Methods: Data from a nationally representative sample of 4,641 adults who participated in the 2017-2018 NHANES survey was analyzed. During the NHANES, adults participated in a physical examination, complete with blood draw. Dietary intake data was obtained using 24-hour recall. Serum vitamin D was collected for study participants during the MEC exam using the CDC method of high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) for the quantitative detection of 25-hydroxyvitamin D. For the present analysis, serum Vitamin D levels are presented as 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 + D3 (nmol/L). Depression was assessed using the PHQ-9. All data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 survey procedures to account for the unequal sampling probability and complex survey design of the NHANES. All models are energy-adjusted and adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and household income. Results: In this sample of US adults, there was a significant negative linear relationship between serum Vitamin D and reported depressive symptoms (p=0.03). Additionally, higher levels of serum vitamin D levels were associated with better physical functioning. When evaluating Vitamin D intake, individuals with clinical depression had significantly lower intake of Vitamin D from food sources (4.3 vs 3.3 mcg, p=0.004) than those without depression. Conclusions: These results demonstrate an association between serum vitamin D level, depression, and physical functioning in adults. Public health messaging that encourages intake of Vitamin D-rich foods may be an important dietary strategy for supporting mental health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vernarelli et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: