This article on James Malcolm Rymer’s popular penny blood, The String of Pearls (1846-7), examines how property functions as another type of narrator within the story. Frequently, the text’s actual narrator displays either an inability or unwillingness to disclose crucial information, such as what happens in Todd’s shop when his customers appear to vanish. However, the proliferation of objects left behind by these customers, including their hats, canes, and the eponymous pearls, subtly reveals the solution to the mystery. Thus, this property possesses a type of narrative agency. Property operates collaboratively with the story’s restricted narrator to prolong the narrative and foster suspense, while encouraging the reader to serve as an amateur detective alongside the story’s characters. By implementing a restricted narrator and supplementing those restrictions with the highly suggestive and revealing movements of property, Rymer underscores both the centrality of property in the Victorian world and demonstrates how that property itself constitutes a series of miniature “texts” for interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarah Bliss (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: