Ultraviolet-C light (UV-C) has been widely used for disinfecting food, water, air, and environments. The use of robots to perform environment disinfection has been considerably researched in recent years, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the advantages of dynamic UV-C light sources are not well discussed in the literature. This study aims to demonstrate the advantages of using dynamic UV-C sources instead of stationary sources and discuss the appropriate lamp distances and speeds. Through simulations, comparisons were made between the areas covered by a dynamic and stationary UV-C source in a given time frame. The results demonstrate that a punctual dynamic light source in a simple rectilinear movement can cover an area over 66% greater than the best case of a static source in the same time budget. Additionally, this work highlights the importance of considering the incidence angle, the calculation of the ideal distance for a static point lamp, and the effects of using inadequate simulation resolution. Properly calculating the speed and distance of the UV-C light source can reduce the application time and, consequently, the energy consumption and associated costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pfleger et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: