The purpose of this article is to address obstetric violence and the doctor’s civil liability. The research explores the complexities of obstetric violence, highlighting disrespectful and abusive practices during the pregnancy-puerperal cycle. The doctor’s civil liability emerges as a key piece, not only as a reparation mechanism, but as a reflection of the dynamics between the pregnant woman’s autonomy and the provision of health care. Furthermore, the study highlights systemic responsibility, encompassing institutional healthcare structures, and emphasizes the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. The intersectionality between social inequalities and obstetric violence is highlighted, highlighting the need for comprehensive public policies. Ultimately, the research promotes awareness of obstetric violence, advocating for woman-centered practice, and points to the importance of medical ethics, effective communication, and respect for autonomy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freitas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: