Research demonstrates the detection threshold for the broken sample problem in high dimensions, indicating new insights into bivariate distributions.
We revisit the classical broken sample problem: Two samples of i.i.d. data points X=₁,⋯, Xₙ\ and Y=₁,⋯,Yₘ\ are observed without correspondence with m≤ n. Under the null hypothesis, X and Y are independent. Under the alternative hypothesis, Y is correlated with a random subsample of X, in the sense that (Xπ(i),Yᵢ)'s are drawn independently from some bivariate distribution for some latent injection π:[m] → [n]. Originally introduced by DeGroot, Feder, and Goel (1971) to model matching records in census data, this problem has recently gained renewed interest due to its applications in data de-anonymization, data integration, and target tracking. Despite extensive research over the past decades, determining the precise detection threshold has remained an open problem even for equal sample sizes ($m=n$). Assuming m and n grow proportionally, we show that the sharp threshold is given by a spectral and an L₂ condition of the likelihood ratio operator, resolving a conjecture of Bai and Hsing (2005) in the positive. These results are extended to high dimensions and settle the sharp detection thresholds for Gaussian and Bernoulli models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: