Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals how optimal policies differ in absorbing games and stochastically stationary opponents.
This paper investigates properties of Blackwell ε-optimal strategies in zero-sum stochastic games when the adversary is restricted to stationary strategies, motivated by applications to robust Markov decision processes. For a class of absorbing games, we show that Markovian Blackwell ε-optimal strategies may fail to exist, yet we prove the existence of Blackwell ε-optimal strategies that can be implemented by a two-state automaton whose internal transitions are independent of actions. For more general absorbing games, however, there need not exist Blackwell ε-optimal strategies that are independent of the adversary's decisions. Our findings point to a contrast between absorbing games and generalized Big Match games, and provide new insights into the properties of optimal policies for robust Markov decision processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grand-Clément et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: