Computational and experimental analysis reveals crystal structures and mechanical stiffness in biobased furandicarboxylates, suggesting equivalence to petroleum-based polyesters.
Conformational characteristics and conformation-dependent properties of poly(ethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PEF), poly(trimethylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PTF), and poly(butylene 2,5-furandicarboxylate) (PBF) have been revealed via NMR experiments and molecular orbital calculations on their model compounds, along with refined rotational isomeric state calculations for the polymers. The O(CH2)yO (y = 2, 3, and 4) segments of the polyesters exhibit conformational preferences similar to those found in the corresponding poly(alkylene terephthalate)s. The most stable conformations identified for PEF, PTF, and PBF are tg ± t, tg ± g ± t, and tg ± tg∓t, respectively. Their spatial configurations and conformational flexibilities significantly depend on conformations around the (furan)C–C(═O) bonds. Additionally, periodic density functional theory calculations were employed to optimize the α′ crystal structure of PEF, resulting in the equilibrium α form with a monoclinic lattice containing two all-trans chains. Young's moduli along the a, b, and c axes of the optimized α crystal were calculated to be 26.8, 12.5, and 141 GPa, respectively. These values are comparable to those of poly(ethylene terephthalate).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoshide et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: