The scientific output of Slovakia, particularly in the social sciences and humanities, has faced considerable criticism regarding its quality and international impact. This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Slovak scientific literature in the social sciences and humanities from 1993 to 2022. Utilizing data from the Central Registry of Publication Activity (CREPČ; Slovak universities; N = 230,606), the EPCA database (Slovak Academy of Sciences; N = 9,844), Scopus (N = 25,677), and Altmetrics (N = 681), we examined publication types, language use, open-access availability, authorship patterns, international collaborations, and impact metrics. The results indicate that Slovak research output in social sciences and humanities is characterized by a high proportion of local language publications and very limited presence in high-impact, international journals. Additionally, the citation impact and international collaboration rates are lower than the EU and OECD averages. Despite some positive trends, such as an increase in open-access publications, the overall scientific production remains below the expected standards. The study underscores the need for strategic reforms in the Slovak academic system to enhance research quality and international visibility, providing critical insights for policymakers and academic institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adamkovič et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: