Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We show that unconstrained quadratic optimization over a Grassmannian Gr(k,n) is NP-hard. Our results cover all scenarios: (i) when k and n are both allowed to grow; (ii) when k is arbitrary but fixed; (iii) when k is fixed at its lowest possible value $1$. We then deduce the NP-hardness of unconstrained cubic optimization over the Stiefel manifold V(k,n) and the orthogonal group O(n). As an addendum we demonstrate the NP-hardness of unconstrained quadratic optimization over the Cartan manifold, i.e., the positive definite cone Sⁿ₊₊ regarded as a Riemannian manifold, another popular example in manifold optimization. We will also establish the nonexistence of FPTAS in all cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: