Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis reveals the failure of vicarious responsibility in the PT Timah case, highlighting legal boundaries when perpetrators are corporate superiors.
The alleged corruption case of tin commodity trading system in the PT Timah Tbk Mining Business License (IUP) area for the 2015-2022 period has caused state losses of hundreds of trillions of rupiah. This article examines the applicability of vicarious responsibility theory or substitute responsibility theory to the case of corruption in the tin commodity trading system in the PT Timah Tbk Mining Business License (IUP) area. This research aims to look at all aspects of corporate liability theory, one of which is vicarious responsibility theory. Related to the corruption case of PT Timah Tbk, vicarious responsibility theory does not apply, because the perpetrator is a superior, so it is not possible for his subordinates or other people to take responsibility for his actions
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sari et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: