Abstract Objective: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare the effect of different fixed lingual retainers (LRs) on tooth mobility after orthodontic treatment using a Periotest®device. Materials and methods: A total of 82 patients (43 females and 39 males; mean age = 18.61 ± 3.71 years) with no missing teeth in the lower inter-canine region were treated with fixed orthodontic mechanics. At the completion of the orthodontic treatment, each patient was fitted with either Ortho FlexTech (Reliance; Group I), dead soft 8-braided (Bond-A-Braid, Reliance; Group II), or 5-stranded (PentaOne, Masel; Group III) LR wire. A control group consisting of people with a healthy periodontal condition and no bone loss was included (Control; Group C). The mobility of the lower anterior teeth on the right and left sides was measured using a Periotest®device before (T₀), immediately after (T₁), and 10 months after (T₂) the application of the LR. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc LSD, repeated ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, and Pearson χ² tests. Results: Tooth mobility was significantly lower at T₁ and T₂ compared to that at T₀ (P < 0.05); however, there were no differences in the mobility at T₁ and T₂ in all study groups (P > 0.05). When the mobility measurements taken at the different times were compared, there was no statistical difference between the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: In all the study groups, tooth mobility decreased immediately after LR application and did not change during the 10-month follow-up. There were no significant differences in tooth mobility among the study groups. Clinical relevance: Any of the studied types of retainer wires could be used by clinicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Küçük et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: