Purpose To measure oxygen demand, uptake, and deficits in competitive cross-country skiers during outdoor roller skiing at different competition durations, ranging from the endurance domain to the sprint domain. Methods Ten competitive cross-country skiers (6 males; V̇ V ˙ O 2max 78 ± 3 and 4 females; V̇ V ˙ O 2max 62 ± 3 mL∙kg −1 ∙min −1 ) raced time trials consisting of 1, 2, and 4 laps in a 1.6 km racecourse in a randomized order with 35 min recovery in-between. Oxygen uptake was measured using a wearable metabolic system while oxygen demand was estimated from kinematic data (GPS and IMU) and an athlete-specific model of skiing economy. Skiing economy and V̇ V ˙ O 2max was established on a separate test day using six submaximal constant-load trials at different speeds and inclines, and one maximal-effort trial on a roller-skiing treadmill. Results Average oxygen demand was 112 ± 8%, 103 ± 7% and 98 ± 7% of V̇ V ˙ O 2max during the 1 (3:37 ± 0:20 m:ss), 2 (7:36 ± 0:38 m:ss) and 4 (15:43 ± 1:26 m:ss) lap time trials, respectively, and appeared to follow an inverse relationship with time-trial duration. Average oxygen uptake was unaffected by race length (86 ± 5%, 86 ± 5%, and 86 ± 7% of V̇ V ˙ O 2max , respectively). Accumulated oxygen deficit at the end of each time trial was 85 ± 13, 106 ± 32 and 158 ± 62 mL∙kg −1 , while oxygen deficits per work bout was 23 ± 3, 18 ± 3 and 16 ± 3 mL∙kg −1 for the 1, 2, and 4-lap time trials, respectively. Conclusion Elite cross-country skiers adjust their pacing strategies from attaining relatively small oxygen deficits per work bout in the endurance domain, to larger deficits in the sprint domain. This indicates a shift in strategy from prioritizing stable work-economy and rate-of-recovery in the endurance domain, to maximizing power output in the sprint domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gløersen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: