Herein, we investigated decreased susceptibility (DS; MICs 0.25-4 mg/L) and resistance (R; MICs >4 mg/L) to aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI). Contemporary non-replicate clinical isolates of carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli (n=90) (CP-EC) and ESBL-producing E. coli (n=12) (EP-EC) was used. CP-EC belonged to 25 distinct sequence types (STs) and all EP-EC belonged to ST405. All strains were isolated through 2019-2022 at the Karolinska University Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden. ATM-AVI MICs were determined with broth microdilution and the EUCAST epidemiological cutoff value of 0.125 mg/L was used to define the wildtype (WT). Whole genome sequences (Illumina) were analyzed for detecting of resistance determinants among WT vs non-WT isolates. Among 102 isolates, 40 (39%) and 62 (61%) were WT and non-WT respectively. Among non-WT isolates 20 were R and 42 were DS. Resistance was observed among 14/47 NDM-producers, 5/43 OXA-48 group producers, and 1/12 EP-EC. DS was observed among 29/47 NDM, 13/43 OXA-48 group, and 3/12 EP-EC. Resistant isolates predominantly belonged to ST405 followed by STs 410, 361, 167, 617, and 1284. Presence of PBP3 inserts (YRIK/YRIN) were observed in 20/20 and presence of CMY-42 in 5/20 resistant isolates. Several mutations in the ftsI (encoding PBP3) and regulatory genes of outer membrane proteins (OmpC and OmpF) and efflux pumps (AcrAB-TolC) were detected. A ≥2-fold reduction in MICs were observed among 20/20 vs 7/20 isolates tested in the presence of the membrane permeabilizer PMBN and efflux inhibitor PAβN, respectively. In conclusion, resistance to ATM-AVI is a result of interplay of various determinants, including target alterations, deactivating enzymes, and decreased permeability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tellapragada et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: