A common side effect of spinal anesthesia is spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH). The preoperative prediction of SAIH may prevent hypotension-related complications. Carotid Doppler ultrasound enables non-invasive assessment of the corrected carotid flow time (ccFT) and the carotid peak velocity variation (ΔVpeak CCA ). This study aimed to evaluate the ability of ccFT and ΔVpeak CCA to predict SAIH. Prospective, observational, single-center study. Operating room. 42 patients presenting for elective surgery under spinal anesthesia. At the holding area, the ccFT and ΔVpeak CCA were assessed with carotid Doppler ultrasound by a novice and experienced sonographer. In the operating room, the occurrence of hypotension was observed for 10 min after an intrathecal injection of local anesthetic. The area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) was determined for ccFT and ΔVpeak CCA . The correlation between ccFT or ΔVpeak CCA and the change in blood pressure was evaluated. The interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Of all patients, 43% experienced SAIH. The ccFT was 359 ± 30 ms in normotensive and 358 ± 18 ms in hypotensive patients ( p = 0.91), while the ΔVpeak CCA was 7 [6–8] % in normotensive and 7 [6–11] % in hypotensive patients ( p = 0.34). The AUROC was 0.52 [0.35–0.70] for ccFT and 0.59 [0.41–0.77] for ΔVpeak CCA . There was no correlation between the percentage change in blood pressure and the ccFT or ΔVpeak CCA . The ICC between sonographers was 0.93 [0.85–0.96], ( p < 0.001) for ccFT and 0.76 [0.55–0.87], (p < 0.001) for ΔVpeak CCA . The bland-Altman analysis demonstrated acceptable accuracy and precision for ccFT. The ccFT and ΔVpeak CCA do not predict the occurrence of SAIH. No correlation was found between these parameters and the percentage change in blood pressure after spinal anesthesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Houte et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: