This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) molecules present endogenous peptides to CD8+ T-cells for immunosurveillance of infections and cancers. Recent studies revealed unexpected heterogeneity in MHC I expression among cells of different lineages. While respiratory diseases rank among the leading causes of mortality, studies in mice showed that lung epithelial cells (LECs) express lower MHC I levels than all other tested cell types. The present study aimed to evaluate MHC I expression in human LECs from parenchymal explants using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and immunostaining of primary human LECs. After confirming the low constitutive MHC I expression in human LECs, we observed a significant upregulation of MHC I across three chronic respiratory diseases: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and cystic fibrosis (CF). Additionally, we unveiled an unexpected sexual dimorphism in MHC I expression in both health and disease, with males exhibiting higher levels of MHC I under steady-state conditions. Gene expression analyses suggest that differential redox balance between sexes is instrumental in this dimorphism. Our study unveils the complex interplay between MHC I expression, sex, and respiratory diseases. Since, in other models, MHC I upregulation contributes to the development of immunopathologies, we propose that it might have a similar impact on chronic lung diseases. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study shows that MHC I expression is very low in healthy LECs but escalates significantly in three chronic respiratory diseases, potentially contributing to disease progression. Furthermore, sex-specific divergences in LEC MHC I levels hint at distinct susceptibilities to chronic lung inflammation between males and females.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathé et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: