Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim Optimal selection and allocation of donor hearts is a relevant aspect in transplantation medicine. Donor age and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) affect post-transplant mortality. To what extent donor age impacts intimal hyperplasia (CAV IH ) in pediatric and adult patients after heart transplantation (HTx) is understudied. Methods In a cohort of 98 HTx patients, 58 pediatric (24.1% with adult donors) and 40 adult patients, we assessed the effect of donor age and donor-recipient age difference (D-R) on the continuous parameter of maximal intima thickness (mIT) in optical coherence tomography. We evaluated their predictive value regarding higher mIT and the prevalence of CAV IH , defined as mIT > 0.3 mm, and compared it to established CAV risk factors. Results In the overall population, donor age correlated with mIT ( p < 0.001), while in the pediatric subpopulation, both donor age and D-R correlated with mIT ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). In the overall population, donor age was a main predictor of higher mIT and CAV IH ( p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively) in addition to post-transplant interval, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia. In the pediatric patients, dyslipidemia remained a main predictor of both higher mIT and CAV IH ( p = 0.004 and p = 0.040, respectively), while donor age and D-R were not. Conclusion While there was an effect of the non-modifiable parameter of donor age regarding maximal intimal thickness, a stronger association was seen between the modifiable risk factor dyslipidemia and higher maximal intimal thickness and CAV IH in both the overall population and the pediatric subpopulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ulrich et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: