Abstract Purpose: To compare the perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes of the intracorporeal neobladder and extracorporeal neobladder (ECNB) technique following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). Methods: We reviewed our single-institutional, prospectively collected database for consecutive patients who underwent RARC with an ileum neobladder from July 2016 to February 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the approach of reconstruction (ICNB or ECNB). The chi-squared test and Wilcoxon test were used to summarize categorical and continuous variables, respectively. survival and complication outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariate logistic regression and Cox hazards models. Result: Among 304 patients, 190 ICNB patients and 114 ECNB patients were identified. A shorter median operative time (320 vs. 354 minutes; p = 0.001) and less median EBL (300 vs. 500 ml; p = 0.000) were recorded in the ICNB group. A significant difference in 90-d overall complications was detected between the 2 groups (49.5% vs. 61.4%; p = 0.043). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, relapsed tumor and surgical approach (ECNB/ICNB) were individual predictive factors for 90-d overall complications. The functional outcomes and survival rates were comparable between the ICNB and ECNB groups. A Cox proportional hazards model indicated that higher pathological stage and pN status are predictors of both recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Conclusion Compared with ECNB, ICNB significantly improved perioperative outcomes without compromising functional or oncological outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: