Recording information today has been one of the biggest challenges, as the mass of information increases over time. To use these information records it is necessary that they are recoverable. The need to organize information for later retrieval has been the object of studies, which make possible dialogues between fields of knowledge that have information as an instrument, namely, Museology and Information Science; The present work presents a bibliographic survey about studies of Information Organization (IO) and Information Representation (IR) in a museological context, with the objective of deepening the understanding of this theme, both IO and IR in these spaces; To do so, Bardin's Content Analysis was adopted as a methodology, it was developed in the search of a set of Annals of events and Databases that constitute the largest indexers of scientific content about the theme of this work; Dealing with a possible dialogue of the Organization and Representation of Information in Museums, shows the concern in exploring a subject that is not very expressive in the databases of events and research, if related to other more recurrent themes. The dialogue between OI and RI for access to information in museological institutions facilitates access to information both for the public that accesses these places and for professionals who have direct contact with museological documentation. And yet, it corroborates the development of practices of professionals working in the field of Museology, Information Science and the like, through the dissemination of information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paula et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: