Valeria Luiselli's 2019 novel Lost Children Archive records and reimagines visa-less migrant children's encounters with hostile borders, while also challenging the logic and legality of border policy, a set of neocolonial practices that allows former colonial powers to continue their control over the mobility of bodies and epistemologies from the Global South. In an interview with The New Yorker about her novel, Luiselli commented on the role of narrative in conceptualizing and achieving justice when the law fails to deliver or denies justice: "Perhaps the only way to grant any justice—were that even possible—is by hearing and recording those stories over and over again so that they come back, always, to haunt and shame us."Footnote1 Luiselli thus highlights not only the power of storytelling in delivering justice otherwise denied, but also its ability to generate a moral, emotional, and intellectual response in its audience. This paper analyzes how Luiselli employs "factional"Footnote2 narrative to "haunt and shame us," question existing border policies, and grant authorial and narrative justice in the absence of institutional or legal justice through the extended metaphor of children on the move. I introduce the concept of "tripartite subjectivity" in analyzing how Luiselli's factional children are, on the one hand, victims of and witnesses to the violence perpetrated by border laws, and, on the other hand, agents who challenge and reinterpret hostile borders, transforming the static border into a site of epistemic rupture. The tripartite subjectivity of Luiselli's lost children provide a model via which characters who have been deprived of what Thomas Nail calls "socially determined status" (and thereby are rejected border access due to their inability to contribute to the state's kinopolitical expansion) reclaim both fictional and epistemological borders through a reverse kinopolitics of what I term "bordered expansion by archive."
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dharshani Lakmali Jayasinghe (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: